Best Time to Replace Equipment

By Scout Nelson

Replacing farm machinery was one of the most important financial choices for any farm. The decision required careful planning, financial review, and a clear understanding of operating risks. Relying only on feelings or rising repair bills often leads to poor timing and higher costs.

A useful economic method called Equivalent Uniform Annual Cost, or EUAC, helped evaluate equipment replacement. EUAC showed the average yearly cost of owning and operating a machine across its life. It combined purchase cost, interest, and repairs into one yearly amount. This method allowed farms to compare old and new equipment fairly.

Two main costs were formed by the EUAC. Capital recovery included value loss and interest costs. These costs were highest when the machine was new. Annual operating costs mainly came from repair and maintenance needs.

These costs were the lowest when equipment was new and increased as machines aged. The goal was to find the point where repair costs grew faster than value loss slowed.

To make a replacement decision, farms compared the EUAC of a new machine with the Annual Marginal Cost, or AMC, of keeping the old one for another year. AMC included repair estimates, loss in value, and interest in the machine’s current value.

In the example, a new combine had the lowest yearly EUAC of $33,277. Keeping the older combine cost about $28,000 for one more year. Since the old machine costs less to operate for another year, the data suggested keeping it longer.

However, real-world factors also mattered. The downtime risk was critical. A major breakdown during planting or harvest could cause lost yield, higher repair fees, and weather damage. If downtime risk was too high, replacement became the safer choice even if repair costs were lower.

Financial strength also guided the final decision. Large equipment purchases require strong cash flow and stable loan capacity. Heavy debt could affect future land purchases and other investments. If financial limits were tight, delaying replacement would be necessary.

The best time to replace equipment came when rising repair risk and failure costs outweighed the savings of keeping old machines and when financial strength could support new equipment payments.

Photo Credit: gettyimages-jackf